Media Is Worthy Of Their "Fake News" Reputation

On August 4’ 2018 President Trump tweeted,  Fake News reporting, a complete fabrication, that I am concerned about the meeting my wonderful son, Donald, had in Trump Tower. This was a meeting to get information on an opponent, totally legal and done all the time in politics - and it went nowhere. I did not know about it!.   After the tweet the MSM went nuts with the most outrageous claims. (See the links below for some of the hysteria).
Pundits are claiming that the tweet confirms President Trump lied about the meeting in Trump Tower; that President Trump lied about the subject of the meeting.  The MSM is also claiming this "new" information will certainly bring down the president.
The problem is, all this information was already reported by the MSM.  Nothing is new here.
The media is playing this up in an attempt to distract the country, to draw the country's attention away from the fact that the Mueller investigation has found nothing concerning President Trump colluded, what ever that means, with the Russians in order to defeat Hillary Clinton.
Below is a link to a CNN article with a timeline published August 4, 2017, that's right, 2017. 

Timeline of Donald Trump Jr.'s meeting revelations

Below is just a sample of the faux breaking revelations:

President Admits Trump Tower Meeting Was Meant to Get Dirt on Clinton

Trump Tweet Appears To Alter Story

We The People No Longer Have Control Of Our Government

With the Speaker of The House, Speaker Paul Ryan, not allowing a vote on the resolution to impeach Rod Rosenstein is a example that the citizens of this country do not have any input to how Congress responds to the voters demands.
Rep. Jim Jordan and others drafted a resolution with articles of impeachment of Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.  DOJ, Rosenstein, refuse to comply with requests and subpoenas for DOJ and FBI for documents "covering the Russia probe — including the FBI's use of informants to make contact with the 2016 Trump campaign and speculation it had abused Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act powers to gather information on Trump associates — and its examination of Hillary Clinton's private email server."
A brief background on why Rep Jordon is taking this action:  Rep. Jordan's (and others) actions is an attempt to exercise their Constitutional obligation to provide oversight of the agencies of the US government that they, Congress, have established.  In particular Congress is attempting to resolve the questions of the actions taken by the FBI and the DOJ in the investigations of the 2016 Trump campaign, the use of a "dossier" prepared by the opposing campaign, Hillary Clinton's campaign, as evidence of "collusion" that the Trump campaign and Trump himself, had with the Russian government, and the investigation and subsequent dismissal of any wrong doing by Hillary Clinton in her action of using a private, civilian email server for all her Secretary of State email communications.
Just the fact that Clinton sent and received classified information through using non-State Department, non-government, unsecured email server and the DOJ and FBI dismissed this act as carelessness but not a violation of government and State Department regulation regarding the handling classified information is enough for the Congress to suspect preferential treatment was provided by the DOJ and FBI to Hillary Clinton and her campaign and State Department staff.
As we have learned in recent weeks, a unauthorized entity had infiltrated the Hillary Clinton private email server and altered the server in such a way that the server would automatically forward all incoming and outgoing emails to an unauthorized email address.  This means that a unauthorized entity has had knowledge of all Clinton's email communications during her tenure as Secretary of State.  This includes email communications between herself and, the the time, the President of the United States, President Obama, DOD, intelligence agencies, and individuals in other sensitive areas of the government.
Since the DOJ/FBI has decided not to take action against Hillary Clinton, her State Department Staff or her Campaign staff for violating many government regulations and US laws that require protection of classified information in their possession, Congress has every right to investigate and delve into the process and documentation surrounding the FBI's investigation.
Since Speaker Ryan has refused to allow the Rep. Jordan's he is refusing to let the American people know why an individual who violated US laws was not held accountable.


Jim Jordan: 'We will actually call the vote for the impeachment of Rod Rosenstein'

FBI Rewrites Federal Law to Let Hillary Off the Hook | National Review

Clinton Email Investigations: Trump Justice Department Revives Them | National Review

Statement bye FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton's Use of a Personal Email Server

Gohmert: Watchdog Found Clinton Emails Were Sent to "Foreign Entity"

Clinton Broke Federal Rules With Email Server, Audit Finds

Congressional Investigators Find Irregularities in FBI's Handling of Clinton Email Case

FBI Found Extensive Evidence Hillary Emails Violated Federal Records Laws

Hillary's Crininal Accomplcies

Who are Hillary’s accomplices in her email scandal?

Many State department employees knew exactly that Hillary, then United States Secretary of State was operating outside of the law, outside of policies and certainly outside of any semblance of responsibility or patritism to the the people of the country.

We also learned recently that Uma Aberdeen, Hillary Chief of Staff, was approached by State Department IT managers and indicated IT would build Hillary a secured BlackBerry for her to use for State Department business. Aberdeen enfatically refused, saying “that’s not going to happen”. Why would the SoS chief of staff, the SoS herself be so opposed in using the State Departments classifed email system when conductiong Sate Dept business? This question has yet to be answered.

Who are Hillary’s accomplices? Probably we, the American people, will never know.

Will she be indicted and prosecuted? Probably indicted but probably never prosecuted. I believe the deal has already been sealed. The deal? Obama will premptive pardon Hillary if she ever is indicted. This will allow Hillary to continue her campaign, secure the Democratic nomination and if elected to the Office of President of the United States, she would be able to take office.

ABC News: Hillary Clinton Emails: A Timeline of What Rules Were Allegedly Ignored

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/hillary-clinton-emails-timeline-rules-allegedly/story?id=29442707

Reuters: White House says will not release emails between Obama, Clinton

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-clinton-emailswhitehouse-idUSKCN0SO2QG20151031

Where is this country heading?

This country is in the begininng of the Presidential primaries. The Democrats have a suspected felon, suspected of mis-handling some of the nations most hightly classified documents, an admitted Socialist who has done nothing in his years in the US Senate and a nobody Govenor that has no chance of accomplishing anything during his primary run.

On the Republican side we have a billionaire business man that is so full of himself it’s a wonder he can ever move away from the mirror to attend a rally. Two US Senators, one that at least has lived up to his Senatorail campaign promises, the other has not. A has been Governor that believes just because people can reconize his family’s name he is a shoe in for the nomination. A femail business woman that has is a self made successful business person who by all measures far exceeds the qalifications for President of any of the other candidates. Another Governor who made a fool of himself on national TV welcoming the President of the US with a big bear hug, then turns around and bad mouths the President. A southern Governor who in all honesty would make a good President but unfortunately this country is scared to death of religion, God and those that are deeply religious and believe strongly in God. Then the last is a Libertarian, sort of, that would make a good President except for the fact that the Presidents primary responsibility, as outlined by the Constitution is to protect the country. The Libertarian candidate by his own words will not venture outside of our borders no matter what the threat is.

So where do we go from here?

What's Next On the Progressives Agenda?

If anybody thought getting rid of the rebel flag, the Supreme Court decision to dictate what marriage means, ordering a business to provide a service to a customer that is against the store owners religions beliefs, providing IUDs and other forms of birth control to 15-year-old girls without parental approval or knowledge was the end of the Lefts/Progressives insistence on changing the American society, you were wrong.  The Left will never be satisfied until everyone in the country is obligated by law to conform to their demands.  Below is but just a few links to articles discussing where the left is going next.

The Symbol Of New Orleans is considered racist

Legalize Polygamy!

SEATTLE TEENS GET BIRTH CONTROL AT SCHOOL ‘MORE EASILY THAN THEY CAN 

BUY A SODA’

Now’s the Time To End Tax Exemptions for Religious Institutions

He Really Does Have A Strategy

This tells you all you need to know about where the priorities of the Progressives, the Democratic Party and the President are.  

Obama has been working on a "strategy" to get immigration reform (read amnesty) implemented without Congress (that's without the voice of the people in our form of Government) but he doesn't have a strategy for the terrorist threat that has been growing for many years.  What's happening in Iraq, Syria, Middle East just didn't start in the last couple of months.  The threat to the U.S. has been growing and the Administration and Obama have known about it as demonstrated by the reports linked below.

https://www.ctc.usma.edu/v2/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/CTCSentinel-Vol7Iss8.pdf

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/386694/judicial-watch-feds-bulletin-describes-threat-imminent-terrorist-attack-southern